What is Adversarial Machine Learning?

Cybercriminals and malicious hackers are no longer just breaching firewalls or stealing passwords, they’re targeting the brains behind intelligent systems: machine learning models. According to our 2025 Current research report, 30% of respondents cited security and data privacy concerns as a significant challenge when implementing AI systems. For instance, subtle tweaks to input data or corruption of training datasets can trick AI systems into making errors or producing unexpected outputs. These deliberate manipulations, known as adversarial attacks, are designed to degrade model performance and hijack AI decision-making.

What makes adversarial machine learning so unique is that modified input data (such as slightly altered images or subtly manipulated text) looks completely normal to human eyes but causes the AI model to make serious errors in its processing or decisions. For example, adversarial inputs have been shown to mislead cancer detection models analyzing CT scans. These aren’t bugs—they’re adversarial attacks designed to exploit the way models “think.” In this article, we’ll explore what adversarial machine learning is, how these attacks work, and what you can do to build more secure, trustworthy AI systems.

What is adversarial machine learning?

Adversarial machine learning is a field of study focused on how machine learning models can be manipulated or deceived by malicious inputs, known as adversarial examples. These inputs are intentionally crafted to cause a model to make incorrect predictions, even though they may appear normal to human observers.

Both cybercriminals and security researchers are actively involved in adversarial machine learning, though with different intentions. Security researchers and AI safety experts deliberately create adversarial examples to identify and patch vulnerabilities before malicious attackers can exploit them—a practice known as “red teaming.” Meanwhile, sophisticated cybercriminals and threat actors have begun weaponizing these techniques to bypass AI security systems and compromising facial recognition, fraud detection, and content moderation tools.

For example, an image of a stop sign with subtle, almost invisible modifications might be classified by a computer vision model as a speed limit sign. These attacks can exploit vulnerabilities in AI systems, posing serious risks in applications like autonomous driving, facial recognition, or spam detection. As organizations deploy more AI systems in critical infrastructure, healthcare, and financial services, the potential impact of successful adversarial attacks grows.

How does adversarial machine learning work?

Adversarial machine learning exploits the way machine learning models interpret input data. Understanding how adversarial machine learning works will help you design AI systems that can withstand manipulation and operate safely.

Crafting adversarial examples

Attackers or researchers generate inputs that are almost indistinguishable from legitimate data but are deliberately tweaked to confuse the model. These perturbations are often imperceptible to humans but can alter the model’s output.

For example, an e-commerce company could use an image classification model to automatically categorize product images uploaded by sellers. An attacker might subtly alter the image of a low-cost knockoff sneaker so that it gets misclassified as a high-end brand category. To human reviewers, the image looks normal, but the model’s prediction is manipulated, which might mislead customers.

Exploiting model weaknesses

Adversarial examples exploit blind spots in the model’s decision boundaries, areas where the model hasn’t seen enough examples during training or where its confidence is easily manipulated. For example, a financial fraud detection system trained mostly on western financial patterns might miss an adversarially crafted transaction from another region. In this case, the attacker uses underrepresented data in the training set to bypass fraud detection.

Attack strategies based on model access

The effectiveness and approach of adversarial attacks largely depend on how much information attackers can access about the target model. This knowledge spectrum ranges from complete internal visibility to limited interaction through standard interfaces. For instance:

White-box attacks: The attacker has full access to the model’s architecture, parameters, and gradients.

Grey-box attacks: The attacker has partial knowledge of the model, such as its architecture or training data, but lacks full access to internal weights or gradients. Black-box attacks: The attacker sees only inputs and outputs but can still approximate the model’s behavior through repeated queries.

A hacker might gain internal access to a machine learning model used for loan approvals on a fintech platform. They use this access to study the model’s architecture and gradients to craft highly effective adversarial loan applications that just barely qualify for approval (white-box attack). Later, after losing direct access, they continue to submit variations of these applications and observe the approval outcomes to refine their strategy (black-box attack).

Types of adversarial machine learning attacks

Adversarial attacks come in various forms, depending on how much the attacker knows about the model and what part of the machine learning pipeline they target. These attacks can be categorized based on their strategy, access level, and goals.

How to defend against adversarial attacks

A combination of proactive training techniques, model hardening, and system-level safeguards can help mitigate vulnerabilities. Each of the defense strategies offers a layer of protection, but in practice, combining them with monitoring, logging, and access control provides a strong defense for cloud-based machine learning systems.

Adversarial training

Adversarial training augments the training dataset with adversarial examples so the model learns to classify them correctly. During training, adversarial examples are generated using methods like the fast gradient sign method (FGSM) or projected gradient descent (PGD). These examples are then mixed with clean data in the training process. The loss function is modified to penalize incorrect predictions on both normal and adversarial inputs, helping the model become more resilient.

For example, a SaaS offering a document classification API on a cloud platform might proactively implement adversarial training to improve the model’s robustness. During training, their engineering team generates adversarial versions of documents, like slightly reworded or formatted legal texts that resemble spam, and incorporates them into the training dataset. By doing so, the model learns to correctly classify both clean and subtly manipulated inputs. This makes sure that the API remains reliable even if attackers attempt to game the system.

Input preprocessing

Input preprocessing transforms incoming data to reduce the impact of adversarial perturbations before it reaches the model. Techniques include input denoising, image compression, or applying transformation techniques. These steps can help remove or weaken the adversarial noise without affecting the original data.

Let’s say a healthcare provider uses AI to analyze medical scans (like X-rays or MRIs) and applies preprocessing techniques to incoming images. Even if an attacker manipulates a scan to hide signs of a condition like blurring a tumor boundary, the preprocessing layer (e.g., denoising or compression) can reduce the effect of the tampering and help the model maintain diagnostic accuracy.

Gradient masking

Gradient masking tries to obscure or flatten the gradient information to make it harder for attackers to compute effective adversarial examples. This technique alters the model architecture or training process to produce misleading or less useful gradients. It may involve adding non-differentiable layers, using stochastic activation functions, or output clipping.

For example, a cloud facial recognition API for secure login could use gradient masking so that attackers trying to reverse-engineer facial features via gradients face more difficulty, protecting user privacy and system security.

Model ensembling

Model ensembling uses multiple models to make a collective decision, reducing the chance that a single point of failure will be exploited. Different models (or the same model with varied initializations) are trained on the same task. At inference time, the final prediction is based on voting, averaging, or a learned fusion strategy. This diversity makes it harder for adversarial examples to deceive all models simultaneously.

For instance, a cloud-native recommendation system for online retailers could use an ensemble of collaborative filtering, content-based, and neural models. If one model is attacked, the others can provide stability, maintaining recommendation quality.

Defensive distillation

Defensive distillation trains the model to produce softened class probabilities, making it less sensitive to small perturbations. First, a teacher model is trained on the original data. Then, a student model is trained using the soft labels (probabilities) from the teacher instead of hard class labels. This process smooths the decision boundaries, making the student model less reactive to adversarial inputs.

For example, a financial institution’s automated compliance monitoring system might use NLP models to scan thousands of internal reports, emails, or chat logs for potential regulatory violations or insider trading signals. By applying defensive distillation, the compliance team can train the NLP model against adversarial attempts, such as slightly reworded or obfuscated language that aims to bypass detection.

Adversarial machine learning FAQ

Why are AI models vulnerable to adversarial examples? AI models, like deep neural networks, learn complex patterns from training data but struggle with subtle variations outside that data. Attackers exploit this by introducing small, carefully crafted changes to inputs that can mislead the model, even though the changes are imperceptible to humans.

What industries are most affected by adversarial AI attacks? Any industry uses machine learning for automated decisions, classifications, or pattern recognition. For example, industries like healthcare, finance, autonomous vehicles, and cybersecurity are vulnerable. Adversarial attacks in these areas can lead to misdiagnoses, fraudulent approvals, misclassification of objects, or bypassed security systems.

How can adversarial training improve AI security? Adversarial training strengthens models by exposing them to adversarial examples during training, helping them learn to recognize and resist subtle attacks. This results in stronger decision boundaries and improves the model’s ability to generalize in unpredictable environments.

Can adversarial attacks be completely prevented? Completely preventing adversarial attacks is difficult due to the inherent complexity and sensitivity of machine learning models. However, a combination of defenses like adversarial training, input preprocessing, and anomaly detection can help reduce risk and improve resilience.

References

• Adversarial Attack

• Projected gradient descent (PGD)

• 2025 Current research report

• Red team

Build powerful AI agents with DigitalOcean’s GenAI Platform

DigitalOcean’s new GenAI Platform empowers developers to easily integrate AI agent capabilities into their applications without managing complex infrastructure. This fully-managed service streamlines the process of building and deploying sophisticated AI agents, allowing you to focus on innovation rather than backend complexities.

Key features of the GenAI Platform include:

• Direct access to foundational models from Meta, Mistral AI, and Anthropic

• Intuitive tools for customizing agents with your own data and knowledge bases

• Robust safety features and performance optimization tools

• LLM guardrails to provide safer, enjoyable, on-brand agent experiences

Ready to supercharge your applications with AI? Sign up for DigitalOcean’s GenAI Platform today!