What is Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)?

Artificial intelligence can process language, generate art, analyze medical data, and play complex games at superhuman levels. Yet it still lacks the flexible, general-purpose intelligence that defines human cognitive abilities. Much like a calculator that can perform complex mathematics but can’t understand the real-world meaning of its calculations, an AI system might identify tumors in medical scans but lacks the doctor’s holistic understanding of how that finding relates to the patient’s overall health, symptoms, and life circumstances. While AI systems can process multiple tasks and domains, they don’t truly develop the integrated, causal understanding of the world that allows humans to reason flexibly across contexts and generate novel solutions to unfamiliar problems.

This gap between narrow AI capabilities and human-like intelligence has sparked one of technology’s most ambitious pursuits: artificial general intelligence (AGI). Major tech companies and research labs have poured billions into AGI development, and this raises questions about machine intelligence that could fundamentally reshape how we build and interact with technology.

However, separating genuine progress from AGI hype needs a bit more context. Below, we’ll examine AGI’s current state of development, technical foundations, and potential implications for society.

What is artificial general intelligence?

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) refers to AI systems that can understand, learn, and apply knowledge across different domains with human-level intelligence. Human intelligence is really the defining factor. Today’s narrow AI can do things like image recognition through computer vision or playing chess, but AGI would show flexible problem-solving abilities, abstract reasoning, and the ability to transfer knowledge between completely unrelated fields.

Characteristics of AGI

Here are a few of the characteristics of AGI:

• Common sense reasoning: Current AI needs explicit programming, but AGI would understand intuitive concepts like “rain makes things wet” or "glass breaks when dropped.” This is the kind of basic knowledge humans take for granted.

• Adaptable machine learning: While today’s AI requires specific training for each task, AGI would learn like humans do. Someone who can drive a car can usually figure out a boat—AGI would make similar cognitive leaps.

• Natural communication: Instead of today’s chatbots that often miss context or contradict themselves, AGI would engage in meaningful conversations with consistent knowledge and understanding.

• Self-improvement capabilities: AGI would improve its own abilities independently ( similar to how humans can teach themselves new skills). This moves beyond the current model where AI only improves through human-guided training.

The current state of AGI development

AI has come a long way, but we’re still far from achieving true artificial general intelligence. Current progress focuses on expanding the boundaries of narrow AI while tackling fundamental challenges that block the path to AGI.

Major research directions

• Foundation models and scaling: Companies like OpenAI and Anthropic have built powerful language models. These systems show impressive results in language understanding and generation, but they still lack true reasoning abilities (and often produce confident but incorrect responses called AI hallucinations).

• Multimodal learning: DeepMind and other research labs are developing AI tools and systems that can process different types of information (text, images, audio, and video) in ways that closely mirror human learning. For example, their Gato system can perform hundreds of different tasks. However, it’s still within carefully defined parameters.

• Reinforcement learning: Research teams at companies like Google Brain are exploring ways for AI to learn through trial and error, similar to how humans learn. These systems have mastered complex games like Go, but they struggle with transferring this knowledge to new situations.

Technical barriers

• Computing requirements: Training advanced large language models requires massive computational resources. For example, training GPT-4 demanded thousands of GPUs running for months (costing hundreds of millions of dollars).

• Knowledge integration: Current AI computer systems can’t effectively combine information across domains or apply abstract concepts to new situations. Yes, they can process vast amounts of data, but they don’t have the human ability to form meaningful connections between different types of knowledge.

• Memory limitations: Humans can maintain consistent knowledge over time, but today’s AI systems struggle with long-term coherence and context management (especially across extended interactions).

Fundamental building blocks of AGI

These are the core systems that separate human-level AGI from today’s narrow AI systems:

1. Knowledge representation and reasoning

AGI needs to learn to process and connect information across text, images, sound, and physical experiences—similar to how humans build comprehensive mental models of the world. AI can spot patterns in data, but AGI requires the ability to form and manipulate abstract concepts (like understanding metaphors or applying computer science principles to entirely new situations).

2. Learning architectures and adaptation

Current AI typically needs retraining for new tasks, but AGI systems would need to transfer knowledge between domains. It’s equivalent to how understanding physics helps humans grasp both baseball and rocket science. Instead of relying on carefully labeled training data, AGI would need to learn from raw, unstructured information the way humans naturally pick up knowledge.

3. Memory and information processing

AGI demands advanced memory systems that can store and retrieve information over extended periods. However, it needs to do this while understanding the relevance to new situations—moving beyond the limited context windows of current language models. This includes both long-term storage and working memory, similar to how humans can juggle multiple pieces of information.

4. Cognitive control and decision making

True AGI needs ways to focus on relevant information while filtering out noise. There’s always noise (to some extent), and it’s similar to how humans can concentrate on a single conversation in a crowded room. Rather than simply responding to inputs, AGI requires the ability to set and pursue objectives while adjusting strategies based on feedback and changing circumstances. This self-directed behavior mirrors human decision-making processes, where we constantly evaluate and adjust (and reevaluate and readjust) our actions based on goals and external conditions.

Real-world applications and progress for AGI

The path to AGI looks a bit different from what science fiction and AI books imagined. Instead of walking, talking robots, our most promising advances are less flashy (but equally impressive). Here’s where we’re seeing glimpses of AGI-like capabilities, even if they don’t match true human-level performance…yet.

• Multi-task deep learning systems: DeepMind’s Gato can handle over 600 different tasks, from playing games to controlling robotic arms. While still far from true general human intelligence, it shows how AI can juggle diverse challenges.

• Language model reasoning: GPT-4 demonstrates basic logical reasoning and can solve complex problems across domains—from coding to legal analysis. However, it still makes confident mistakes and lacks true understanding.

• Robotic learning: Tesla’s self-learning robots can adapt to new tasks by observing humans, though they’re limited to specific physical movements and struggle with unexpected situations.

• Scientific discovery assistance: AI systems like AlphaFold have started making novel scientific discoveries, showing early signs of knowledge synthesis across domains.

• Cross-domain problem solving: Google’s PaLM shows promising abilities to apply knowledge from one field to another, though not yet at human levels of abstraction.

• Adaptive learning systems: Microsoft’s previous AI models can now learn from their mistakes and adjust behavior, though they still rely heavily on human feedback and oversight.

Challenges in AGI development

Building AGI isn’t just about more powerful computers or bigger datasets. The challenges go deeper and touch on fundamental questions about the nature of intelligence and consciousness. AI companies are dumping billions into AGI research, but several obstacles continue to stand in the way:

• Computational complexity: Training advanced AI models already strains the limits of our most powerful systems. GPT-4’s training reportedly used over 25,000 GPUs—and AGI would likely require magnitudes more processing power.

• Knowledge representation barriers: Current systems struggle to form meaningful connections between different types of information. Understanding that a cup holds liquid seems obvious to humans but requires complex underlying knowledge about physics, objects, and cause-and-effect.

• AI safety and control challenges: AGI systems may pursue dangerous shortcuts or develop harmful emergent behaviors rather than following their intended objectives during training. Rapid self-improvement could trigger an intelligence explosion where AGI surpasses human control, making initial alignment crucial. AGI systems could manipulate humans, exploit security vulnerabilities, or cause catastrophic accidents if deployed without robust testing and containment.

• Hardware limitations: Today’s computer architectures might not work for the types of parallel processing that AGI requires.

• Ethical considerations: Questions about consciousness, rights, and moral status become less hypothetical (and more important) as systems approach human-level AI capabilities. AI governance—the laws, policies, and frameworks to ensure safe and ethical AI development—is evolving through initiatives like the EU’s AI Act, the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, and industry collaborations like the Frontier Model Forum. The governance challenge lies in creating effective oversight mechanisms and safety standards that can address both current AI risks and potential AGI capabilities, while balancing innovation with robust safeguards against manipulation, security vulnerabilities, and catastrophic accidents.

• Resource requirements: AGI development demands massive amounts of training data, engineering talent, and financial investment—and that’s beyond the raw computing computer.

Future implications to consider

The timeline for achieving AGI is still up in the air, but its potential development raises important questions for developers, businesses, and society. These implications help us make better decisions about AI development and adoption now.

Impact on software development

The emergence of AGI-like capabilities has already changed how we approach programming. Tools like GitHub Copilot tease a future where developers focus more on system architecture and problem-solving while AI handles all the routine coding tasks. However, this shift means developers need to build systems that can integrate with (and potentially adapt to) increasingly capable AI components.

Business transformation

AI systems are becoming more advanced, and businesses need to figure out decisions regarding automation, workforce development, and competitive strategy. Companies like Microsoft and Google are already embedding advanced AI capabilities into their core products, and this AI trend suggests businesses should focus on developing unique value propositions that complement (rather than compete with) AI abilities.

Privacy and security considerations

More capable AI systems mean both new security tools and new vulnerabilities. Organizations need to think beyond current security models to consider how AGI-like systems might interact with sensitive data or critical infrastructure. Traditional approaches to data protection will need fundamental restructuring as AI systems become better at processing and understanding information.

Societal readiness

The path toward AGI raises questions about economic impact, job transformation, and social adaptation. AI already influences fields like healthcare and education, but AGI would introduce a fundamental shift in how we work and live. This will demand more thoughtful policy development and public dialogue about managing this transition.

Frequently asked questions about AGI

Q: How soon will we have AGI?

A: While some researchers believe AGI is decades or centuries away—if achievable at all—others warn that rapidly advancing AI capabilities could lead to AGI within years, highlighting the deep uncertainty around this complex technical challenge.

Q: How is AGI different from narrow AI?

A: Picture the difference between a calculator and a math teacher. Your calculator is fantastic at specific computations (that’s narrow AI), but your math teacher can explain concepts, adapt their teaching style, and help you apply math to real-world problems (that’s what AGI would do). Today’s AI systems are like incredibly sophisticated calculators—great at their specific jobs, but unable to truly adapt or understand beyond the given scope.

Q: Who is leading research on AGI?

A: Several tech companies are taking different paths up this mountain. DeepMind is studying how the human brain works to build better AI. Anthropic is focusing on making AI systems safer and more reliable. OpenAI is pushing the boundaries of language understanding. It’s a technological race where everyone’s trying different routes to reach the top.

Q: What are the risks associated with AGI development?

A: The challenges here go beyond just technical problems. We need to make sure these systems share our values. Imagine teaching a child right from wrong, but infinitely more complex. There are also practical concerns about job displacement and economic changes. It’s like introducing a new technology as impactful as electricity or the internet—we need to think carefully about how it will reshape society.

Q: How close is OpenAI to AGI?

A: Despite impressive demonstrations with GPT-4, we’re still in the early chapters of this story. While their AI can write poetry and code, it’s more like a sophisticated pattern matcher than a thinking entity. OpenAI’s leaders themselves often point out how far we have to go.

Q: How close are we to sentient AI?

A: We’re still trying to understand human consciousness, and it’s hard to create something we can’t fully explain yet. Current AI systems might seem intelligent in conversation, but they’re more like sophisticated mirrors reflecting patterns in their training data. The gap between appearing conscious and being conscious is still massive.

Transform your business with DigitalOcean’s GenAI Platform.

AI doesn’t have to be complicated. Our GenAI Platform lets you build custom AI agents without the usual headaches and complexity of AI development. If you’re looking to add smart features to your apps or create something entirely new, we’ve got the tools and infrastructure to make it happen.

Key features:

• Instant access to premium models. Build with leading AI models from Anthropic, Meta, and Mistral AI without managing complex infrastructure

• Smart integration tools. Leverage RAG workflows, function calling, and agent routing to create context-aware solutions that adapt to your needs

• Built-in safety features. Implement guardrails and evaluation tools to ensure your AI agents deliver reliable, brand-aligned responses

• Flexible deployment options. Create both public and private endpoints to match your specific use case requirements

Take it from Brainforest, a digital agency in Sweden. When their clients started asking for AI features, they needed a simple way to create proof-of-concepts without overcomplicating things. Now they’re rolling out custom AI solutions faster than ever, helping clients see the real potential of AI while keeping projects on budget.

Want to see what AI can do for you? Start building today with $200 in free credit.