OAuth 2 is an authorization framework that enables applications — such as Facebook, GitHub, and DigitalOcean — to obtain limited access to user accounts on an HTTP service. It works by delegating user authentication to the service that hosts a user account and authorizing third-party applications to access that user account. OAuth 2 provides authorization flows for web and desktop applications, as well as mobile devices.
This informational guide is geared towards application developers, and provides an overview of OAuth 2 roles, authorization grant types, use cases, and flows.
Deploy your frontend applications from GitHub using DigitalOcean App Platform. Let DigitalOcean focus on scaling your app.
OAuth defines four roles:
From an application developer’s point of view, a service’s API fulfills both the resource and authorization server roles. We will refer to both of these roles combined, as the Service or API role.
Now that you have an idea of what the OAuth roles are, let’s look at a diagram of how they generally interact with each other:
Here is a more detailed explanation of the steps in the diagram:
The actual flow of this process will differ depending on the authorization grant type in use, but this is the general idea. We will explore different grant types in a later section.
Before using OAuth with your application, you must register your application with the service. This is done through a registration form in the developer or API portion of the service’s website, where you will provide the following information (and probably details about your application):
The redirect URI is where the service will redirect the user after they authorize (or deny) your application, and therefore the part of your application that will handle authorization codes or access tokens.
Once your application is registered, the service will issue client credentials in the form of a client identifier and a client secret. The Client ID is a publicly exposed string that is used by the service API to identify the application, and is also used to build authorization URLs that are presented to users. The Client Secret is used to authenticate the identity of the application to the service API when the application requests to access a user’s account, and must be kept private between the application and the API.
In the Abstract Protocol Flow outlined previously, the first four steps cover obtaining an authorization grant and access token. The authorization grant type depends on the method used by the application to request authorization, and the grant types supported by the API. OAuth 2 defines three primary grant types, each of which is useful in different cases:
Warning: The OAuth framework specifies two additional grant types: the Implicit Flow type and the Password Grant type. However, these grant types are both considered insecure, and are no longer recommended for use.
Now we will describe grant types in more detail, their use cases and flows, in the following sections.
The authorization code grant type is the most commonly used because it is optimized for server-side applications, where source code is not publicly exposed, and Client Secret confidentiality can be maintained. This is a redirection-based flow, which means that the application must be capable of interacting with the user-agent (i.e. the user’s web browser) and receiving API authorization codes that are routed through the user-agent.
Now we will describe the authorization code flow:
First, the user is given an authorization code link that looks like the following:
https://cloud.digitalocean.com/v1/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=CLIENT_ID&redirect_uri=CALLBACK_URL&scope=read
Here is an explanation of this example link’s components:
When the user clicks the link, they must first log in to the service to authenticate their identity (unless they are already logged in). Then they will be prompted by the service to authorize or deny the application access to their account. Here is an example authorize application prompt:
This particular screenshot is of DigitalOcean’s authorization screen, and it indicates that Thedropletbook App is requesting authorization for read access to the account of manicas@digitalocean.com
.
If the user clicks Authorize Application the service redirects the user-agent to the application redirect URI, which was specified during the client registration, along with an authorization code. The redirect would look something like this (assuming the application is dropletbook.com
):
https://dropletbook.com/callback?code=AUTHORIZATION_CODE
The application requests an access token from the API by passing the authorization code along with authentication details, including the client secret, to the API token endpoint. Here is an example POST
request to DigitalOcean’s token endpoint:
https://cloud.digitalocean.com/v1/oauth/token?client_id=CLIENT_ID&client_secret=CLIENT_SECRET&grant_type=authorization_code&code=AUTHORIZATION_CODE&redirect_uri=CALLBACK_URL
If the authorization is valid, the API will send a response containing the access token (and optionally, a refresh token) to the application. The entire response will look something like this:
{"access_token":"ACCESS_TOKEN","token_type":"bearer","expires_in":2592000,"refresh_token":"REFRESH_TOKEN","scope":"read","uid":100101,"info":{"name":"Mark E. Mark","email":"mark@thefunkybunch.com"}}
Now the application is authorized. It may use the token to access the user’s account via the service API, limited to the scope of access, until the token expires or is revoked. If a refresh token was issued, it may be used to request new access tokens if the original token has expired.
If a public client is using the Authorization Code grant type, there’s a chance that the authorization code could be intercepted. The Proof Key for Code Exchange (or PKCE, pronounced like “pixie”) is an extension to the Authorization Code flow that helps to mitigate this kind of attack.
The PKCE extension involves the client creating and recording a secret key — known as a code verifier — for every authorization request. The client then transforms the code verifier into a code challenge and then sends this code challenge and the transformation method to the authorization endpoint in the same authorization request.
The authorization endpoint records the code challenge and the transformation method, and responds with the authorization code as outlined previously. The client then sends in the access token request which includes the code verifier it originally generated.
After receiving the code verifier, the authorization server transforms it into the code challenge using the transformation method first shared by the client. If the code challenge derived from the code verifier sent by the client doesn’t match the one originally recorded by the authorization server, then the authorization server will deny the client access.
It’s recommended that every client use the PKCE extension for improved security.
The client credentials grant type provides an application a way to access its own service account. Examples of when this might be useful include if an application wants to update its registered description or redirect URI, or access other data stored in its service account via the API.
The application requests an access token by sending its credentials, its client ID and client secret, to the authorization server. An example POST
request might look like the following:
https://oauth.example.com/token?grant_type=client_credentials&client_id=CLIENT_ID&client_secret=CLIENT_SECRET
If the application credentials check out, the authorization server returns an access token to the application. Now the application is authorized to use its own account.
Note: DigitalOcean does not currently support the client credentials grant type, so the link points to an imaginary authorization server at oauth.example.com
.
The device code grant type provides a means for devices that lack a browser or have limited inputs to obtain an access token and access a user’s account. The purpose of this grant type is to make it easier for users to more easily authorize applications on such devices to access their accounts. Examples of when this might be useful include if a user wants to sign into a video streaming application on a device that doesn’t have a typical keyboard input, such as a smart television or a video game console.
The user starts an application on their browserless or input-limited device, such as a television or a set-top box. The application submits a POST
request to a device authorization endpoint.
An example device code POST
request might look like the following:
POST https://oauth.example.com/device
client_id=CLIENT_id
The device authorization endpoint is different from the authentication server, as the device authorization endpoint doesn’t actually authenticate the device. Instead, it returns a unique device code, which is used to identify the device; a user code, which the user can enter on a machine on which it’s easier to authenticate, such as a laptop or mobile device; and the URL the user should visit to enter the user code and authenticate their device.
Here’s what an example response from the device authorization endpoint might look like:
{
"device_code": "IO2RUI3SAH0IQuESHAEBAeYOO8UPAI",
"user_code": "RSIK-KRAM",
"verification_uri": "https://example.okta.com/device",
"interval": 10,
"expires_in": 1600
}
Note that the device code could also be a QR code which the reader can scan on a mobile device.
The user then enters the user code at the specified URL and signs into their account. They are then presented with a consent screen where they can authorize the device to access their account.
While the user visits the verification URL and enters their code, the device will poll the access endpoint until it returns an error or an authentication token. The access endpoint will return errors if the device is polling too frequently (the slow_down
error), if the user hasn’t yet approved or denied the request (the authorization_pending
error), if the user has denied the request (the access_denied
error), or if the token has expired (the expired_token
error).
If the user approves the request, though, the access endpoint will return an authentication token.
Note: Again, DigitalOcean does not currently support the device code grant type, so the link in this example points to an imaginary authorization server at oauth.example.com
.
Once the application has an access token, it may use the token to access the user’s account via the API, limited to the scope of access, until the token expires or is revoked.
Here is an example of an API request, using curl
. Note that it includes the access token:
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer ACCESS_TOKEN""https://api.digitalocean.com/v2/$OBJECT"
Assuming the access token is valid, the API will process the request according to its API specifications. If the access token is expired or otherwise invalid, the API will return an invalid_request
error.
After an access token expires, using it to make a request from the API will result in an Invalid Token Error
. At this point, if a refresh token was included when the original access token was issued, it can be used to request a fresh access token from the authorization server.
Here is an example POST
request, using a refresh token to obtain a new access token:
https://cloud.digitalocean.com/v1/oauth/token?grant_type=refresh_token&client_id=CLIENT_ID&client_secret=CLIENT_SECRET&refresh_token=REFRESH_TOKEN
By following this guide, you will have gained an understanding of how OAuth 2 works, and when a particular authorization flow should be used.
If you want to learn more about OAuth 2, check out these valuable resources:
Thanks for learning with the DigitalOcean Community. Check out our offerings for compute, storage, networking, and managed databases.
This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.
You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!
@author @manicas Why are you sending sensitive data as Query parameters (in URL), even though it isn’t recommended by the OAuth2 specification itself ? See the last point.
Don’t pass bearer tokens in page URLs: Bearer tokens SHOULD NOT be passed in page URLs (for example as query string parameters). Instead, bearer tokens SHOULD be passed in HTTP message headers or message bodies for which confidentiality measures are taken. Browsers, web servers, and other software may not adequately secure URLs in the browser history, web server logs, and other data structures. If bearer tokens are passed in page URLs, attackers might be able to steal them from the history data, logs, or other unsecured locations.
Awesome… Thanks man…
Nice Job.
I really love this explanation, concise, clear, and complete. I’ve printed this out and put into a folder called “oauth bible”. Thanks for the great job!
In general, this tutorial is pretty good in contents, technical level and formatting. In the beginning, I really liked it and I wanted to finish it. But the more I read, the more I got confused. For example, these terms “application”, “client”, “user” should be explained in more details. In some context, “application” actually meant to be “client”. In step 2 of Authorization Code section, a “user” actually means “client” instead of resource owner. In other context, “user” means resource owner. Thanks a lot for the work!
This an awesome new feature. Thanks guys !!!
2016 and still useful! Very neat write up.
Good job
Very good explanation of the concepts. The way content is ordered helped me getting first about the OAuth 2.0 and then each grant type helped me to understand the required grant typed for my project. Thanks.
Thank you guys. This tutorial really helped me understand how OAUTH works. I have a little question though I will like to ask what are the steps or how can I generate a signature for my OAUTH requests as I have read that requests without signature may not be so secured.
Thanks.